<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on the &#8220;Science to Business&#8221; Program</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2010/01/31/thoughts-on-the-science-to-business-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2010/01/31/thoughts-on-the-science-to-business-program/</link>
	<description>Science in Canada:  Issues affecting trainees</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:45:40 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lindsay</title>
		<link>http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2010/01/31/thoughts-on-the-science-to-business-program/comment-page-1/#comment-364</link>
		<dc:creator>Lindsay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 08:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/?p=239#comment-364</guid>
		<description>Hi - Great post! I have been thinking about your posts (and Dave&#039;s posts) over the past few months and find that I have a tendency to try to contextualize them in wider problems of society, politics, and policy. Janet Atkinson Grosjean, a researcher at UBC&#039;s Centre for Applied Ethics, quite nicely brings the issue of science translation up to the societal level and tracks it over time. For a summary, listen to the podcast on CBC Radio Ideas: How to think about science. Listen to the last third of Episode 20 (http://www.cbc.ca/ideas/features/science/#episode20). She also has a book. A preview is available on google books.

Public science; private interests: cultures and commerce in Canada’s networks of centres of excellence. 2006, University of Toronto Press.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; Great post! I have been thinking about your posts (and Dave&#8217;s posts) over the past few months and find that I have a tendency to try to contextualize them in wider problems of society, politics, and policy. Janet Atkinson Grosjean, a researcher at UBC&#8217;s Centre for Applied Ethics, quite nicely brings the issue of science translation up to the societal level and tracks it over time. For a summary, listen to the podcast on CBC Radio Ideas: How to think about science. Listen to the last third of Episode 20 (<a href="http://www.cbc.ca/ideas/features/science/#episode20" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbc.ca/ideas/features/science/#episode20</a>). She also has a book. A preview is available on google books.</p>
<p>Public science; private interests: cultures and commerce in Canada’s networks of centres of excellence. 2006, University of Toronto Press.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
