CIHR Updates: Budget 2012 and Science Policy Fellowships

Download PDF

Today’s post is actually two mini-posts – one on CIHR’s response to Budget 2012 and the other on the announcement of their Science Policy Fellowship program.

Response to Budget 2012

Earlier this month, CIHR President Alain Beaudet released a message concerning the federal budget and its impact on CIHR.  Amongst the standard platitudes, a few interesting statements are made that I’d like to highlight for our readers.  First, it is  great to see support for tackling the mental health crisis in Canada – while the details were scant on exactly how this support would be evidenced, it is absolutely a top priority issue.  Secondly, in the wake of 10% overall cuts to CIHR, Beaudet says ”the budget firmly stated that CIHR’s programming in support of basic research, student scholarships and industry-related research initiatives and collaborations has been maintained” – this is good in some respects, but does make me worry about where the 10% cuts are meant to come from.   Finally, he closes with a plea to contribute to something I’ve highlighted on the site before - CIHR’s proposed reforms to its operating grants and peer review.  Now is the time to have your say on CIHR programs with the April 30th deadline for accepting input.  My next post will take a more in-depth look at the proposals and their potential impacts on health research in Canada and I hope that any health researchers reading this will consider voicing their opinion too.

(If you are interested in much less rosy pictures of the budget, do read Professor Ghoussoub’s article last month on the budget and its implications for universities and Hannah Hoag’s article in Nature slamming the federal budget for its negative impact on basic research.)

Science Policy Fellowship Program

An exciting development following on last year’s opportunities for those considering a career in science policy or even for those simply curious about how it all works inside government when it comes to making policy based on evidence.  We’ve written before about careers in the public service and the importance of understanding how policy making works.  These fellowships have the goal of “nurturing critical links between policy makers and external researchers in support of evidence based public policy” and are designed to allow successful applicants the opportunity to become policy fellows for a short time.  This gives the fellows the chance to see how policy making works and gives policy makers access to experts with highly specialised knowledge in particular fields.  Currently, the vast majority (if not all) of these fellowships are in health policy and at Health Canada.

It would be great to hear from those who may have had one of these fellowships to give our readers a sense of what they’d be getting into by undertaking one – if you know someone who has/had one, please do not hesitate to put them in touch with us.

 

 

 

 

Print Friendly

About Dave

David grew up in St. John's Newfoundland, completed a Bachelors degree in Genetics and English Literature (UWO, London, ON) and completed doctoral studies in stem cell biology at the Terry Fox Lab (UBC, Vancouver, BC). He coordinated the UBC Let's Talk Science Partnership Program from 2004-2007. David is currently completing postdoctoral research at the University of Cambridge, UK and also writes for the Canadian Stem Cell Network Blog
This entry was posted in Financial, Policy and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to CIHR Updates: Budget 2012 and Science Policy Fellowships

  1. Jeannine says:

    If the water is cold, clearly cold; one would fishing zones wow
    think that in these conditions. But this is what the pro anglers are competing for.
    I saw a gtass snake sunning itself on tthe
    bank and there seems to be reflected in the online fishing zones wow
    retailer’s financial performance.