<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Black Hole: Science in Canada, Issues affecting trainees &#187; Jim Flaherty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/tag/jim-flaherty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog</link>
	<description>Science in Canada:  Issues affecting trainees</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 14:31:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>2011 Taxes for Post Docs:  At least we know the rules this year</title>
		<link>http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2011/02/21/2011-taxes-for-post-docs-at-least-we-know-the-rules-this-year/</link>
		<comments>http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2011/02/21/2011-taxes-for-post-docs-at-least-we-know-the-rules-this-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2011 17:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Education and Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian Association of Postdoctoral Scholars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Wonders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marianne Stanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical residents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Doc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSHRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UofT PDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/?p=1055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, one of the hottest topics on the site was Budget 2010 and the new rules regarding postdoctoral fellowships. Those entries are still amongst the most popular: (latest post) 2012 Taxes for Postdocs: Dredging up the Past 2010 Canadian Taxes: &#8230; <a href="http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2011/02/21/2011-taxes-for-post-docs-at-least-we-know-the-rules-this-year/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2011/02/21/2011-taxes-for-post-docs-at-least-we-know-the-rules-this-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The CRA response to CAPS:  Implications and where should we go from here?</title>
		<link>http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2010/05/11/the-cra-response-to-caps-implications-and-where-should-we-go-from-here/</link>
		<comments>http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2010/05/11/the-cra-response-to-caps-implications-and-where-should-we-go-from-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 07:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Carl</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee status]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Doc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UofT PDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/?p=427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[QUICK HIT: The Black Hole team is thrilled to welcome its first guest blogger to the site. Carl Wonders is a post doctoral fellow at the University of Toronto and one of the founding members of the UofT Post Doc &#8230; <a href="http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2010/05/11/the-cra-response-to-caps-implications-and-where-should-we-go-from-here/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2010/05/11/the-cra-response-to-caps-implications-and-where-should-we-go-from-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CAPS Getting Progress in Parliament</title>
		<link>http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2010/03/24/caps-getting-progress-in-parliament/</link>
		<comments>http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2010/03/24/caps-getting-progress-in-parliament/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[degrees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fellowships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graduate Student]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marc garneau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Doc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Communcation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSHRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UofT PDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just thought I would quickly bring it to people&#8217;s attention that the Canadian House of Commons has been hopping with activity regarding post doctoral fellows and the repercussions of Budget 2010. A quick scan of the comments in March &#8230; <a href="http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2010/03/24/caps-getting-progress-in-parliament/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2010/03/24/caps-getting-progress-in-parliament/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budget 2010:  Post Docs, be careful what you wish for&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2010/03/10/budget-2010-post-docs-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/</link>
		<comments>http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2010/03/10/budget-2010-post-docs-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Financial]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget 2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada Graduate Scholarship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIHR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[degrees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fellowship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graduate Student]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Flaherty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[life choices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSERC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PDF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PhD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Post Doc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scholarship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSHRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Harper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UofT PDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vanier Scholarship]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/?p=279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week Canadians were treated to another Harper Government budget where the post doctoral stage of developing highly qualified researchers was finally recognized as an important part of the research enterprise. Post docs shared a grand &#8220;hurrah!&#8221; as this was &#8230; <a href="http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2010/03/10/budget-2010-post-docs-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://scienceadvocacy.org/Blog/2010/03/10/budget-2010-post-docs-be-careful-what-you-wish-for/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

